Unverified report
Received but not yet checked against documents or independent sources.
Methodology
How CCMDS reviews and publishes information
The aim is to document recurring regulatory problems without turning allegations into facts by repetition.
Verification levels
Evidence being assessed
Chronology, records and applicable rules are being examined.
Core facts corroborated
The principal factual claims are supported by reviewed records.
Institution contacted
A formal representation, correction request or right-of-reply invitation has been sent.
Outcome recorded
A corrective action, explanation or satisfactory result has been documented.
No further action
The matter is withdrawn, unsupported, duplicated, outside scope or otherwise concluded.
What we verify
- Identity or confidential pseudonymous verification
- Dates and chronology
- Authenticity and relevance of documents
- Applicable regulations or published guidance
- Whether the institution had an opportunity to respond
- Whether publication could expose patients or third parties
What we reject
- Threats, abuse or discriminatory content
- Unredacted patient records
- Doxxing or private contact details
- Manipulated or misleading documents
- Claims that cannot be separated from speculation
- Requests for retaliation against named individuals
Publication format
Each report should display its status, issue category, jurisdiction, authority, date first published, date last updated, evidence reviewed, institutional response, outcome and correction history.
Timestamp policy: Every material update should show the date and nature of the change.